You are here

Whatever It Takes

There's an interesting article of the same title by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker. It discusses in great detail the prevalence of torture in the popular TV show 24 (disclosure: I'm one of the few humans alive who has not watched 24...I assume I will someday on DVD, though I'm not so sure any more after reading this article...a show apparently so obsessed with torture doesn't sound attractive to me). It's a detailed, lengthy article. I'll highlight some of the most interesting passages here, but the whole thing is worth reading.

Bob Cochran, who created the show with Surnow, admitted, "Most terrorism experts will tell you that the ‘ticking time bomb' situation never occurs in real life, or very rarely. But on our show it happens every week."

Since September 11th, depictions of torture have become much more common on American television. Before the attacks, fewer than four acts of torture appeared on prime-time television each year, according to Human Rights First, a nonprofit organization. Now there are more than a hundred, and, as David Danzig, a project director at Human Rights First, noted, "the torturers have changed. It used to be almost exclusively the villains who tortured. Today, torture is often perpetrated by the heroes." The Parents' Television Council, a nonpartisan watchdog group, has counted what it says are sixty-seven torture scenes during the first five seasons of "24" more than one every other show. Melissa Caldwell, the council's senior director of programs, said, " ˜24' is the worst offender on television: the most frequent, most graphic, and the leader in the trend of showing the protagonists using torture." The show's villains usually inflict the more gruesome tortures: their victims are hung on hooks, like carcasses in a butcher shop; poked with smoking-hot scalpels; or abraded with sanding machines. In many episodes, however, heroic American officials act as tormentors, even though torture is illegal under U.S. law. (The United Nations Convention Against Torture, which took on the force of federal law when it was ratified by the Senate in 1994, specifies that "no exceptional circumstances, whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.")

This past November, U.S. Army Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, the dean of the United States Military Academy at West Point, flew to Southern California to meet with the creative team behind "24." Finnegan, who was accompanied by three of the most experienced military and F.B.I. interrogators in the country, arrived on the set as the crew was filming. At first, Finnegan wearing an immaculate Army uniform, his chest covered in ribbons and medals aroused confusion: he was taken for an actor and was asked by someone what time his "call" was. In fact, Finnegan and the others had come to voice their concern that the show's central political premise-that the letter of American law must be sacrificed for the country's security was having a toxic effect. In their view, the show promoted unethical and illegal behavior and had adversely affected the training and performance of real American soldiers. "I'd like them to stop," Finnegan said of the show's producers. "They should do a show where torture backfires."

Finnegan told the producers that "24," by suggesting that the U.S. government perpetrates myriad forms of torture, hurts the country's image internationally. Finnegan, who is a lawyer, has for a number of years taught a course on the laws of war to West Point seniors-cadets who would soon be commanders in the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. He always tries, he said, to get his students to sort out not just what is legal but what is right. However, it had become increasingly hard to convince some cadets that America had to respect the rule of law and human rights, even when terrorists did not. One reason for the growing resistance, he suggested, was misperceptions spread by "24," which was exceptionally popular with his students. As he told me, "The kids see it, and say, ‘If torture is wrong, what about "24"?' " He continued, "The disturbing thing is that although torture may cause Jack Bauer some angst, it is always the patriotic thing to do." Gary Solis, a retired law professor who designed and taught the Law of War for Commanders curriculum at West Point, told me that he had similar arguments with his students. He said that, under both U.S. and international law, "Jack Bauer is a criminal. In real life, he would be prosecuted." Yet the motto of many of his students was identical to Jack Bauer's: "Whatever it takes."

Afterward, Danzig and Finnegan had an on-set exchange with Kiefer Sutherland, who is reportedly paid ten million dollars a year to play Jack Bauer. Sutherland, the grandson of Tommy Douglas, a former socialist leader in Canada, has described his own political views as anti-torture, and "leaning toward the left." According to Danzig, Sutherland was "really upset, really intense" and stressed that he tries to tell people that the show "is just entertainment."

His [Surnow's] favorite bumper sticker, he said, is "Except for Ending Slavery, Fascism, Nazism & Communism, War Has Never Solved Anything." Although he is a supporter of President Bush-he told me that "America is in its glory days"-Surnow is critical of the way the war in Iraq has been conducted. An "isolationist" with "no faith in nation-building," he thinks that "we could have been out of this thing three years ago." After deposing Saddam Hussein, he argued, America should have "just handed it to the Baathists and . . . put in some other monster who's going to keep these people in line but who's not going to be aggressive to us." In his view, America "is sort of the parent of the world, so we have to be stern but fair to people who are rebellious to us. We don't spoil them. That's not to say you abuse them, either. But you have to know who the adult in the room is."

Comments

You are not the only person in America who has not watched 24. I was chatting with a colleague the other day who told me he had not watched it either. I don't try to explain you people, I just learn to live with it :>)I have the entire first season on DVD, if you're interested. But I must warn you, it is intensely addictive.Here is my problem with what is being said about 24. Several years ago, a conservative stood up, and in a speech, mentioned that the actions of a television show could have a detrimental impact on society, and was seriously maligned as a result. Everyone from Letterman to Carson to evening news anchors ridiculed him mercilessly, saying, "it is just a TV show."Time has shown that maybe Dan Quayle was wrong about the impact of the TV show on society, since teen pregnancies seem to be going down over the years.Now, a conservative creates a very successful TV show, and people who lean toward to the left worry that this could be sending the wrong message to the world, could impact negatively the way people view the USA. To quote the myriad people responding to VP Quayle's complaints about Murphy Brown: "Lighten up."

Jason,I would tend to agree. It's interesting that the views of students about torture are apparently shifting as a consequence of their TV viewing, but folks need to be taught that TV is not directly connected to reality rather than changing TV shows to better reflect it. Again, I don't watch the show, but it does seem kind of obnoxious that it is apparently so obsessed with torture and that the torture always works...but, whatever, it's TV not reality.

As a regular viewer of the show, I would argue that it is not obsessed with torture. Certainly there are scenes that portray it, but it certainly does not always work. This season, terrorists tortured Jack, but he did not crack. He just bit the terrorist on his jugular, until he bled to death, then spit the remains onto the floor. Later, he was torturing a terrorist, and decided the guy didn't know anything, but another person came and tortured him some more, and he gave up the info. Then, Jack was torturing his brother, who works with the terrorists, and the brother gave him false information that threw him off track. Finally, the terrorists were torturing a member of the Counter Terrorist Unit, and forced him to build a trigger for their nuke, but it remains to be seen whether he truly cracked, or if he just says he did.See? There isn't THAT much torture in the show.And btw, that was all in this season, which isn't even halfway over yet :>)

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer