Entertainment

Last night was the third episode of the second season of 30 Days. The first of the season featured a legal immigrant from Cuba (who is now a minuteman) living 30 days with an illegal immigrant family. In the second episode, an out-of-work computer programmer travelled to India to train for and re-take his outsourced job. In last night's episode, an atheist lives 30 days with a Christian family. These shows are pretty interesting. Of course, nobody changes their point of view over night. It's nice, though, to see people with opposing points of view spend some time together, walk in someone elses shoes, communicate instead of talk AT each other, and find some common ground. Set your Tivo for the 30 Days marathon (7 episodes) this Saturday on FX (starting at noon eastern).

From a blog post of the same title in Greg Stevenson's blog (see his blog post for more);

With the consumption of so many violent stories in my youth, why have I not grown into a homicidal maniac? Especially since that is exactly what our society tells us happens. Violence is a problem in our society, as it is in most. Many have decided that the cause of this problem is the portrayal of violent stories in the media. Children who watch violent shows, they say, build up aggression and are taught that violence is the way to release that aggression and solve problems. Thus, they imitate in real life what they watch on screen. I have long suspected this was a shallow, naive, and ill-informed response to a complex problem. I certainly do not want to minimize the problem of societal violence nor minimize the role that the media may legitimately play, but blaming television or film violence as the primary cause is a bit like blaming the Hostess company for your weight problem. We often crave easy solutions to complex problems. The truth is that many factors are at play: the abdication of parental responsibility, societal attitudes, school culture, etc. Focusing on the media as the primary problem and suggesting shielding children from all violent content without distinction is problematic for two reasons: 1) It removes the focus from the other significant causes and thus creates a situation where removal of violent content becomes the "solution" that may not solve anything. 2) It distorts the actual role of violent stories in a culture... The fact is that violent stories permeate the Bible from beginning to end. .. Do we ignore the role of violence in the Bible or do we acknowledge that violent stories can be valuable catalysts for moral growth? I did not really know how to address the complexity of the role that violent stories play for children until I read a controversial book by Gerard Jones titled Killing Monsters: Why Children NEED Fantasy, Super Hero, and Make-Believe Violence... He argues that fantasy violence is essential for the proper emotional development of children. He tells stories of children who grow up in families where all access to violent stories are removed, and yet the child still cuts their toast into the shape of a gun and plays with it. He consults child psychologists who argue that playing Cowboys and Indians or pretending to be Darth Vader are healthy ways for children to cope with this world and to learn how to live peacefully in it. And what about all the studies showing media violence makes people violent? Jones examines these studies and demonstrates persuasively that they do not show quite what they claim to show and sometimes actually demonstrate the opposite. Jones is careful to distinguish between fantasy violence (the focus of his book) and realistic portrayals of violence that are not appropriate or helpful to children. Many would counter that children are not capable of distinguishing between reality and fantasy. For a handful of kids, that is true. But Jones argues, and numerous psychologists back him up, that our children are very capable of making that distinction and often do a better job of it than adults.

I have a similar experience. I certainly wasn't sheltered from violence as a kid (I LOVED professional wrestling!), but I have no personal interest or experience in violence. I've tried to keep my boys sheltered from it, yet battling the "bad guys" and each other with swords and guns is their favorite activity. I can buy that this is natural and harmless. However, I also have to think that repeated viewing of realistic portrayals of violence must tend to desensitize to it in real life (a recent study said the same about video game violence)...

Another brilliant and hilarious web 2.0 marketing ploy along the lines of The Sith Sense and The Subservient Chicken: Send a Snakes on a Plane prank call from Samuel L. Jackson (via Waxy.org) In other funny Samuel L. Jackson news, it's been reported that he will play the voice of God in a new audio version of the Bible (via Digg).

From an article of the same title by Mark Moring in Christianity Today:

When Mel Gibson made The Passion of the Christ, no Hollywood studio would touch it, so the director funded it himself. But when the movie earned $371 million, Tinseltown took note, and it was only a matter of time before it decided to jump on the Jesus bandwagon. Now two major Jesus-themed films are in the works: On December 1, New Line Cinema, which hit it big with the Lord of the Rings trilogy, releases The Nativity Story. And next Easter, Sony Pictures, the studio behind The Da Vinci Code, releases The Resurrection. The Nativity Story tells the tale of Joseph and Mary, the journey of the magi, the rule of King Herod, and the birth of Christ. The Resurrection picks up where The Passion left off, telling the story of the 40 days between the Resurrection and the Ascension.

If you watch TV, you must have seen that goofy Head On commercial. Apparently, it's at least partly intentional. Get the story from Slate here.