You are here

Health

Employer-Backed Health Care

Kind of boring, but not for 45 million Americans nor for more and more of us in the coming years. From "Employer-Backed Health Care Is Here to Stay, for Lack of a Better Choice" by Reed Abelson in the NY Times:

The number of uninsured Americans is about 45 million and climbing. Companies like General Motors, with large numbers of older or retired workers receiving generous benefits, are struggling under ever-higher health care bills. More companies are abandoning their role in providing health insurance to their employees, and some people worry the federal tax overhaul now being discussed could scare away even more employers. So, are we in the final days of the company health plan? Probably not. Frustrations with the status quo notwithstanding, the current system of providing insurance to most working Americans through their employers is not likely to disappear, according to policy analysts and consultants in Washington and around the country. That is mainly, they say, because none of the other possibilities, like a government-run plan or some new private-sector solution, have enough support to serve as a replacement. Employers "are not about to get out of the business of providing health insurance to employees, even though they complain so loudly about it," said Paul B. Ginsburg, the president of the Center for Studying Health System Change, an independent research group in Washington. Inspiring the latest round of debate is the proposal introduced last month by the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, as part of a sweeping effort to overhaul the tax system. Under the proposal, tax breaks for both employers and their workers for health benefits are limited to $11,500 of coverage for a family and $5,000 for an individual. Under current tax law, there are no limits to how much coverage is exempt from payroll and income taxes. Many say the proposal is a political nonstarter. But some critics see it as a threat to a system that is already unraveling. Only 60 percent of employers now offer coverage, compared with 66 percent as recently as 2003, according to annual survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit health research group in Menlo Park, Calif. In 2000, the percentage was 69 percent. If the tax advisory panel's recommendations on employer-sponsored health care went into effect, they would "dismantle our current health care system," Representative Pete Stark, a California Democrat, said in a news release. That might be an exaggeration, and the proponents of the plan assert that they are not trying to take away the entire tax advantage of providing employer-based coverage. Instead, people may view it as "a tax on excessive health plans," one of the panel members, Representative Connie Mack, Republican of Florida, said in a news conference.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

carpal.jpg

According to Harvard:

The popular belief that excessive computer use causes painful carpal tunnel syndrome has been contradicted by experts at Harvard Medical School. According to them, even as much as seven hours a day of tapping on a computer keyboard won't increase your risk of this disabling disorder. The pain, numbness, and tingling are more common in those who do assembly-line work in industries such as manufacturing, sewing, cleaning, or meatpacking. Genes account for about half the cases. Women are more likely than men to suffer the syndrome. Additional factors involve weight, pregnancy, and some diseases. Being overweight doubles the risk, according to several medical studies.

Tags: 

Detroit Not Fattest

From an article in The Detroit News: Detroit was America's fattest city in 2004 and third fattest in 2005, but now it's dropped all the way down to fifteenth. Chicago is now the fattest. Baltimore is the fittest.

Top 25 Fattest Cities
(2005 rankings are in parenthesis)
1. Chicago (5)
2. Las Vegas (9)
3. Los Angeles (21*)
4. Dallas (6)
5. Houston (1)
6. Memphis, Tenn. (4)
7. Long Beach, Calif. (20)
8. El Paso, Texas (11)
9. Kansas City, Mo. (18)
10. Mesa, Ariz. (15)
11. Indianapolis (13)
12. San Antonio (10)
13. Fort Worth, Texas (14)
14. Miami (19)
15. Detroit (3)
16. Columbus, Ohio (16)
17. Oklahoma City (21)
18. Cleveland (24*)
19. Wichita, Kan. (17)
20. Charlotte, N.C. (24)
21. San Diego (9*)
22. Fresno, Calif. (14*)
23. Philadelphia (2)
24. San Jose, Calif. (17*)
25. New York (8)

Menstruation in the News

From an article entitled "Another School Barrier for African Girls: No Toilet" in The New York Times:

In [sub-Saharan Africa] where poverty, tradition and ignorance deprive an estimated 24 million girls even of an elementary school education, the lack of school toilets and water is one of many obstacles to girls' attendance, and until recently was considered unfit for discussion. In some rural communities in the region, menstruation itself is so taboo that girls are prohibited from cooking or even banished to the countryside during their periods. But that impact is substantial. Researchers throughout sub-Saharan Africa have documented that lack of sanitary pads, a clean, girls-only latrine and water for washing hands drives a significant number of girls from school. The United Nations Children's Fund, for example, estimates that one in 10 school-age African girls either skips school during menstruation or drops out entirely because of lack of sanitation.

And in other menstruation-related news, from an extensive article in Macleans by Lianne George, The end of the period: A new contraceptive will soon let women stop menstruating. Is it the pinnacle of liberation, or a reckless experiment?:

In 2006, a new oral contraceptive called Anya, developed to "put women in control of when or if they want to menstruate," is expected to hit the Canadian and U.S. markets. Manufactured by Collegeville, Penn.-based Wyeth Pharmaceuticals -- and currently pending approval by Health Canada -- Anya is the first low-dose birth control pill designed to be taken 365 days a year, without placebos (the hormone-free sugar pills taken at the end of every 28-day cycle). Early findings report that Anya is just as effective in preventing pregnancy as traditional oral contraceptives (98 per cent). And as an added bonus, since Anya provides a steady stream of hormones, it promises to quash a woman's usual cyclical fluctuations, virtually wiping out all the irksome symptoms of PMS. Brasner and other advocates of stopping menstruation point out that among the greatest fallacies in modern popular medicine is the notion that women on oral contraceptives -- roughly 1.5 million in Canada -- experience a period every month. In fact, what they experience is "a fake period," what doctors call a withdrawal bleed. "Women on birth control bleed not because they're having a menstrual cycle, but because when they take their placebo pills, their bodies are withdrawing from the progesterone cycle in the active tablets," says Dr. Leslie Miller, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington, who runs the pro-suppression website Noperiod.com. In other words, she says, there's nothing natural about it. In fact, the reason women on oral contraceptives bleed at all is because of one man, a devout Catholic named Dr. John Rock, the co-inventor of the pill. Forty-five years ago, Rock determined that if he could design the pill to replicate the menstrual cycle of the average woman of child-bearing age -- 28 days -- he might succeed in convincing the Church to endorse his invention as a natural form of birth control. Despite his efforts, the Vatican denounced oral contraceptives in 1968, but the 28-day cycle persisted because -- fake or not -- women were comforted by the idea of monthly bleeding. (As evidence of how deeply women have internalized this idea, even Anya, which is taken every single day, will be sold in packages of 28 to preserve the notion of a natural cycle.) But Miller argues that since the bleeding serves no apparent purpose -- except a psychological one -- why not get rid of it altogether? But all of this good news, detractors say, is based on the assumption that periods serve no function other than reproduction -- and that you can isolate them from every other system in the body. This, they argue, is preposterous. "Menstruation, this amazingly intricate, carefully crafted cycle, is a vital sign of our health," says Dr. Jerilynn Prior, an endocrinologist and the scientific director of the Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research at the University of British Columbia. "To wantonly disrupt it is a horrifying thought. Regulatory bodies are saying, 'We approved the original pill, so this must be okay. It's just taking the pill more frequently.' But even the original pill probably contains negatives we still don't really know about." The continuous-use pill, she says, is just a way for pharmaceutical companies to revive flagging products -- to find fresh ways to market them by giving them a "new face and a new name."

Violent Video Games

This story from NewScientist.com argues a point I've long believed must be true: doesn't engaging in such realistic simulations of savagery affect your response to it in real life?

...psychologist Bruce Bartholow from the University of Missouri-Columbia and colleagues have found that people who play violent video games show diminished brain responses to images of real-life violence, such as gun attacks, but not to other emotionally disturbing pictures, such as those of dead animals, or sick children. And the reduction in response is correlated with aggressive behaviour.

Tags: 

Pages

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer